Choose a review setup
Specialist review uses one broad scientific challenger. Independent council runs methods, statistics, and evidence reviewers separately against the same selected inputs. Their profiles and review instructions are curated by the product.
Council members do not see each other’s critiques. They use your configured provider, so independent runs may still share model blind spots. Agreement is not proof, peer review, or scientific certification.
Supply the claim and its evidence
Choose a project, select Idea or hypothesis, Research paper, or Scientific result, then state the central claim and its context. Attach a CSV or PDF, or select existing project materials and retained results.
Only the selected inputs are included. An idea can be reviewed without files, but missing or inaccessible evidence limits the conclusions. Turn on plan review if you want a checkpoint before research proceeds.
Read each critique
Open each reviewer in Your stress tests. Follow Open full review, evidence and questions to inspect sources, approve plans, or answer questions.
The curated rubric asks for the evidence behind each concern, its severity, confidence with a reason, the strongest alternative explanation, and a concrete resolving test. It also asks for strengths and counterarguments. Review the cited evidence yourself.
Control the work and decide what comes next
Reviews continue on the server after leaving the page. Stop test cancels active reviewers and prevents further steps. Retained findings remain available. A council shares the configured request allowance across its reviewers.
Use the critiques to prioritize experiments and clarify uncertainty. The product does not provide a fabricated quality score or guarantee acceptance. If a start request disconnects, Retry previous stress test resends the exact saved request without duplicating it.